Ordinal reanalysis of the SHEP trial.

نویسندگان

  • Philip M W Bath
  • Chamila M Geeganage
  • Laura J Gray
چکیده

To the Editor: The article by Patel and colleagues relating to long-term follow-up of patients in the SHEP study1 highlights a common problem in vascular prevention trials, namely that the sample size needed to detect an effect on ‘all’ stroke (or the composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death) is insufficient to assess effects on fatal events alone. In the case of SHEP, chlorthalidone-based antihypertensive therapy significantly reduced all stroke (269 events) but not fatal stroke (only 24 events, relative risk 0.91, P 0.51).2 Conventional solutions to this problem of low statistical power include extending follow-up (as Patel and colleagues do1) or looking for effects on fatal events across related trials, eg, using meta-analysis as done with aspirin.3 Demonstrating reductions in both stroke and fatal stroke supports the claim that the intervention reduces both stroke and its severity. We have proposed an alternative solution which achieves this aim in one analysis, namely that binary vascular outcomes such as stroke/no stroke can be converted into a 3-level ordered categorical outcome, eg, fatal stroke/nonfatal stroke/no stroke.4 Adding transient ischemic attack (TIA) generates a 4-level outcome: fatal stroke/nonfatal stroke/transient ischemic attack/no stroke. These data may be analyzed using nonparametric approaches including Mann-Whitney U test and ordinal logistic regression.5 The following analyses may be performed using data from Table 1 of Patel’s article (outcome for active then control patients with analysis using ordinal logistic regression): Stroke (2-level/binary) 106 (stroke)/2259 (no event) versus 163/2208, odds ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.82), z 3.53. Stroke (3-level) 10 (fatal stroke)/96 (nonfatal stroke)/2259 (no event) versus 14/149/2208, odds ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.82), z 3.53. Stroke/TIA (4-level) 10 (fatal stroke)/96 (nonfatal stroke)/62 (TIA)/2197 (no event) versus 14/149/82/2126, odds ratio 0.66 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.81), z 3.94. These data show that chlorthalidone-based antihypertensive therapy reduces both stroke and its severity, ie, the interventions ‘shift’ patients from fatal stroke to nonfatal stroke, nonfatal stroke to TIA, and TIA to no event (Figure). The use of ordinal statistical approaches has the added benefit that trials may be smaller for a given power, and mimics the approach increasingly being taken in acute stroke.6,7

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Can We Improve the Statistical Analysis of Stroke Trials? Statistical Reanalysis of Functional Outcomes in Stroke Trials

Background and Purpose—Most large acute stroke trials have been neutral. Functional outcome is usually analyzed using a yes or no answer, eg, death or dependency versus independence. We assessed which statistical approaches are most efficient in analyzing outcomes from stroke trials. Methods—Individual patient data from acute, rehabilitation and stroke unit trials studying the effects of interv...

متن کامل

Comparison of Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Bayesian with Generalized Gibbs Sampling for Ordinal Regression Analysis of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

Background and Objectives: Analysis of ordinal data outcomes could lead to bias estimates and large variance in sparse one. The objective of this study is to compare parameter estimates of an ordinal regression model under maximum likelihood and Bayesian framework with generalized Gibbs sampling. The models were used to analyze ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome data.   Methods: This study use...

متن کامل

Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials Collaboration, OAST (2007) Can we improve the statistical analysis of stroke trials? Statistical reanalysis of functional outcomes in stroke

The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on ...

متن کامل

Comments and Opinions Graphic Reanalysis of the Two NINDS-tPA Trials Confirms Substantial Treatment Benefit

Background and Purpose—Multiple statistical analyses of the 2 NINDS-tPA trials have confirmed study findings of benefit of fibrinolytic therapy. A recent graphic analysis departed from best practices in the visual display of quantitative information by failing to take into account the skewed functional importance of NIH Stroke Scale raw scores and by scaling change axes at up to 20 times the ra...

متن کامل

Does the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale add value to the conventional Glasgow Outcome Scale?

The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is firmly established as the primary outcome measure for use in Phase III trials of interventions in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the GOS has been criticized for its lack of sensitivity to detect small but clinically relevant changes in outcome. The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) potentially addresses this criticism, and in this study we estimate...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Stroke

دوره 39 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008